Visit Shaun Dawson's column >>

SHAUN DAWSON

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 5; Links Seeded: 110
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/06/2009

The War on Immigrants

advertisement

President Bush has decided to send in the National Guard to help defend the southern border of the US against illegal immigration. As many as 6,000 guardsmen will be sent to help the Border Patrol. They will have a two week stint before being rotated. They will not be active in apprehending illegals but provide logistic, training and material support for the Border Patrol. They will start deployment in June.

In addition to the troops, Bush urged Congress to enact some form of a guest worker program whereby immigrants will be allowed to work in the US for a specified period of time and then have to return home. With regards to the 12 million illegal immigrants already in the US, Bush would like to see some sort of program that will eventually lead to legalization with appropriate penalties for crossing illegally into the US.

All this was outlined in his speech to the nation on Monday, May 15, 2006.

REACTIONS

The Mexican president Vicente Fox, whose country shares a 2,000 mile border with the US voiced his opposition to this plan in a telephone call to president Bush the day before this speech was given, but conceded that there was nothing he could do but respect the wishes of the US president.

Republican congress leaders generally supported the president on sending the National Guard to help the Border Patrol but criticized other elements of his speech.

"Utilizing the National Guard is an effective, short-term stopgap to immediately strengthen border security as long-range reforms begin to take effect." — Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
"While I appreciate the president's willingness to tackle big problems, I have real concerns about moving forward with a guest worker program or a plan to address those currently in the United States illegally until we have adequately addressed our serious border security problems." — House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

The Democratic response was more critical.

"It is not enough for President Bush to tell us he wants to increase security at our borders. After all, he's had five years to do it. If he wants to be credible on border security, he must acknowledge his mistakes and commit to fixing them." — Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.
"We must protect our borders, but militarizing our borders is a desperate response by the president to his and Republican Congress' policy failures." — House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.

THE PROBLEM

President Bush's attempt to highlight the immigration problem and push congress to come up with a solution has had the effect of polarizing the American public on an issue that has been on the back burner of national politics for many years. There is no easy solution to this problem.

On one hand immigrants come to the US to find jobs that will better their lives and provide for their families back home. They come into the US illegally and tend to depress wages in the unskilled labor market because they are willing to work for less than their American counterparts.

On the other hand both the government and employers are guilty of aiding and abetting these illegal immigrants. The US government has failed to secure the borders and when people are caught trying to cross the border, they are only sent home to try again. If they manage to enter the US, there is no shortage of work for them because employers are willing to overlook their illegal status and offer them employment (usually at reduced wages, but much more than they would be able to earn in their home lands).

Over the years this has led to an underground labor force that has no legal status but has built a life in the US. They work, buy homes or rent apartments, have children (who, by the way, ARE US citizens) and settle down. They are consumers and aid the US economy. There have been attempts in the past to normalize their existence by offering amnesty but the problem with this is that new immigrants keep coming in illegally. The borders are not secure. There are currently about 12 million illegal immigrants in the US, comprising approximately 5% of the entire work force.

THE SOLUTION

First we must stop treating illegal immigrants like they are the enemy. Unlike the many "Wars" we are fighting:

The War on Terrorism, The War on Drugs, The War on Crime, The War on Poverty etc.

We don't need a War on Immigrants.

They have the same hopes and aspirations as all of us......to live a better life and to provide for their families.

We must realize that the primary reason people come to this country illegally is economics. They come here in search of a better life. They come looking for work. They come here to support their families. They come looking for the "American Dream". They are not lazy. They are not free loaders. They are not criminals. They are not terrorists. Legal emigration to the US can take years of waiting without any guarantees. This is not a viable option when your family is hungry and desperate.

The long term solution to illegal immigration is to work with neighboring countries in Latin America, especially Mexico, to find ways to enhance the economic situation of their citizens. If people can make a decent living in their own country there would be no need to migrate.

Job creation through either direct financial assistance or trade arrangements is one option. What can the US do to stimulate the economies of Latin America? This is what we should be asking of our neighbors: How can we help? This should be the number one priority. We need to help our neighbors to help themselves.

Next, making the borders more secure has to be on the agenda. The more difficult it is to cross the less likely people will be willing to try.

Employers must be made to understand that there will be adverse and serious consequences for hiring illegal workers. If illegal immigrants can not find employment here, then they won't come.

Since there is no practical, economical or humane way to deport millions of people, provide the mechanism that will allow them to stay. They are already contributing to the economy. They already have homes and children here. They are part of this society. Bring them out into the open.

  • 9 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.3
2.4
1.2
{"commentId":126037,"authorDomain":"djehuty"}

I particularly like your solutions section.

Something which is difficult to judge from afar is: to what extent is the US dependent upon the cheap labour provided by illegal immigrants? Is there any economic need, apart from the political need, to actually solve this problem?

{"commentId":126037,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"djehuty"}
    Reply#1 - Tue May 16, 2006 5:28 AM EDT
    {"commentId":126090,"authorDomain":"driver"}

    Djehuty, Thanks for your comments. The agriculture industry of this country is heavily dependent on migrant (read illegal) workers. Crops such as apples, oranges and vegetables (too numerous to mention) would rot in the fields if it weren't for these workers. This is seasonal work and many migrant workers will come here to work in the fields and return home when the job is done. The wages are small and there are no benefits. Employers in many cases will set up living accommodations during the picking season and workers are expected to work 6 and sometimes 7 days a week and leave when the season is over. Americans do not want this kind or work.

    Other segments of the economy that need cheap and usually undocumented workers include the service industry (hotels, restaurants etc) and the "home-care" industry (lawn care, baby sitters, elderly assistance etc). What never fails to amaze me is the hypocrisy of some Americans who do not want these jobs and turn a blind eye when someone "turns up" to do it. They hire "Pedro" to cut their lawns and "Maria" to take care of the kids and ask no questions.

    Just as America was built on slave labor, it is dependent on migrant workers to maintain the status quo. Most of the "noise" about illegal workers, in my opinion, is driven by the current political climate where Bush is unpopular (30 something in the polls) and is looking for an issue that will shore up his image among voters as we approach the mid term elections. Republicans are scared of losing control of the Congress in November and are looking for a cause to unite the American voters. They are talking tough about immigration to avoid explaining why we are still in Iraq, why gas prices are going through the roof and why the war on terrorism isn't going so well. But I digress.....

    Like I said before the real solution to this problem is to bring prosperity to the rest of the region so that people won't see the need to migrate to the US. Nobody is talking about illegal Canadian migration.

    {"commentId":126090,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"driver"}
      #1.1 - Tue May 16, 2006 8:37 AM EDT
      {"commentId":126099,"authorDomain":"djehuty"}

      Prime Minister Howard uses the "asylum seeker" issue in the same way, to elicit a knee jerk response. I figured something like you describe was happening with migrant workers throughout poorly paid jobs in the US. Anyway you're right about the real solution, as unlikely as that is to gain support.

      {"commentId":126099,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"djehuty"}
        #1.2 - Tue May 16, 2006 8:56 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":126148,"authorDomain":"regbarc"}

        I think the most accurate reference to the National Guard deployment isn't that they are there to help secure the border, but they are there to take over the administrative functions of some Border Patrol agents (1811's). Posse Comitatus basically forbids the National Guard from securing the border in this situation.

        {"commentId":126148,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"regbarc"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#2 - Tue May 16, 2006 9:57 AM EDT
        {"commentId":127019,"authorDomain":"driver"}

        According to the Bush plan the National Guard (6.000) will not be looking for illegals crossing the border. They will provide administrative support until more Border Patrol guards can be hired and trained. At which point the National Guard will go away.

        {"commentId":127019,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"driver"}
          #2.1 - Tue May 16, 2006 9:00 PM EDT
          {"commentId":127050,"authorDomain":"regbarc"}

          Right. Which is what I think I posted.

          {"commentId":127050,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"regbarc"}
            #2.2 - Tue May 16, 2006 9:31 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":126192,"authorDomain":"oped"}

            You got close to the only solution for the Mexican illegal immigration problem.

            What is the cause of Mexican immigration?

            99.9% of Mexican wealth is in the hands of a dozen Mexican families. These super rich don't redistribute their wealth so the vast majority of Mexicans are forced to live in crushing poverty.

            Mexican rich people, share your wealth. Mexico is losing its best people to the U.S.

            Factoid: Mexico has roughly the same GDP as Australia. Mexico is not a poor country.

            {"commentId":126192,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"oped"}
            • 2 votes
            Reply#3 - Tue May 16, 2006 10:48 AM EDT
            {"commentId":126307,"authorDomain":"weshunt"}

            Just a quick question, how does one propose to get the rich Mexican families to redistribute their wealth? Part of that is, I suppose, where does the wealth come from? If it's from drugs, than the money is off the books and the Mexican government can't tax it.... if it's drugs. I honestly don't know.

            {"commentId":126307,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"weshunt"}
              #3.1 - Tue May 16, 2006 12:27 PM EDT
              {"commentId":126562,"authorDomain":"kmak"}

              Have you guys ever seen a wealth distribution chart for the US?

              Let me give you a hint: it can't be displayed on one graph. One for the richest 1% and another for everyone else. Quite revealing, in my opinion.

              {"commentId":126562,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"kmak"}
                #3.2 - Tue May 16, 2006 3:46 PM EDT
                {"commentId":126688,"authorDomain":"regbarc"}

                Considering the richest 1% are the source of most of the tax revenue, I'd say the government's retribution for them being rich is more than fair. Possibly unfair. Their revenue is also at an all-time high when adjusted for inflation.

                {"commentId":126688,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"regbarc"}
                • 1 vote
                #3.3 - Tue May 16, 2006 4:58 PM EDT
                {"commentId":126753,"authorDomain":"kmak"}

                Good points, James. I was going to comment further, but since we're getting OT here I suppose this discussion can be saved for another time.

                {"commentId":126753,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"kmak"}
                  #3.4 - Tue May 16, 2006 5:41 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":127041,"authorDomain":"driver"}

                  Mexico is not a poor country, the problem with Mexico is that it is a very corrupt country. Bribery is a common and accepted way to do business. It is ingrained in the political and judicial system. Those with money are untouchable. The police are routinely paid off to look the other way. A lot of change has to take place before the common people can truly have any hope for the future.

                  Another point I haven't heard mentioned is that the drug trade across the border is a tightly and ruthlessly managed business. This is a huge source of income for the drug lords and I am sure that they are watching the situation with border security very closely.

                  {"commentId":127041,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"driver"}
                    #3.5 - Tue May 16, 2006 9:20 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":126202,"authorDomain":"kai"}

                    You also forgot to mention the other economic factor at play in the illegal invaders situation. That being the crippling cost to the American citizen taxpayers to support these illegals via welfare, healthcare, education, etc. All free... right out of my pocket.

                    Our nation will be bankrupt in a few years if all these illegals bring their extended families to share in the freeloader mentality.

                    {"commentId":126202,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"kai"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#4 - Tue May 16, 2006 10:56 AM EDT
                    {"commentId":126310,"authorDomain":"weshunt"}

                    explain how the illegals get welfare and healthcare? You have to have a SSN to get those... as an illegal they don't have SSN's... education, yeah their kids do get a free education, as much of an extra economic burden as it is on Americans, isn't it our own country that devised the adage "You can't put a price on education." ?

                    {"commentId":126310,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"weshunt"}
                      #4.1 - Tue May 16, 2006 12:29 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":126563,"authorDomain":"insert"}

                      Can I get a source on "Our nation will be bankrupt in a few years"?

                      Should we not educate the immigrants, so they stay poor? Or, we can educate them so they can better themselves...

                      Easy choice, IMHO, not to mention avoiding punishing the kids who didn't have a choice in the matter.

                      Remember - Illegal immigrants are people too.

                      {"commentId":126563,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"insert"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #4.2 - Tue May 16, 2006 3:47 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":126569,"authorDomain":"kmak"}

                      Kai - 'invaders' is just rhetoric that you are regurgitating. These people have not declared war and are not aliens and are not coming to kill you and your family. They are humans seeking a better way of life and elevation from poverty.

                      Of course, labeling them as 'invader' is a convenient rhetorical way of implying 'enemy' and we all know that without an endless steam of enemies the neo-con adgenda goes nowhere.

                      {"commentId":126569,"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019","authorDomain":"kmak"}
                      • 2 votes
                      #4.3 - Tue May 16, 2006 3:52 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"27993","isPrivate":false}
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      {"threadId":"27993","contentId":"198019"}
                      Start TrackingStart Tracking
                      Stop TrackingStop Tracking